Connect with us

Super Late Models

Latest ABC Committee letter outlines requirements for Gen-6 body approval

The short track industry appears no closer to a resolution over the gen-6 body style …

Skyler Fox Fan Art

Any resolution to the Super Late Model next-generation body debate will not come at this week’s Performance Racing Industry trade show.

There was talk from both representatives at Five Star Bodies and AR Bodies that there could be a meeting or two to take place at the annual trade show, but no such engagement is currently slated for the annual event at Indianapolis, Indiana.

Specifically, ABC Committee member Ricky Brooks said last week prior to the Snowball Derby that a meeting wouldn’t take place because “there is nothing to debate because we aren’t approving the body for 2019.”

The current members of the ABC Committee are made up of the CRA Super Series, Midwest Tour, Big 8 Late Model Series, CARS Tour, Northwest Super Late Model Series, the Race of Champions, Southern Super Series and SRL Southwest Tour — a considerable collection of promoters from all corners of the continent.

The Committee, AR Bodies and Five Star Bodies have been embroiled in a multi-year feud over the approval of the gen-six NASCAR style shell. There is an approval process that all three parties agreed to when it came to the development of a new body. AR Bodies and the ABC allege that Five Star did not seek or receive approval to develop the body.

Meanwhile, the Pro All Stars Series and TUNDRA Series have both approved the new body.

There is also consternation over the downforce levels between the current and new body. There have been two wind tunnel tests for the two shells, but evidence of parity is said to be inconclusive. Committee members have expressed an unwillingness to approve the body unless it matched the downforce numbers of the older car — with both in race trim.

There is also a disagreement over contingency funding from Five Star to the ABC Committee promoters who promote the racing for nearly every major tour in the United States. However, Five Star has agreed to a three-percent price lock for its new body in comparison to its current product.

The initial timeline of events, Five Star’s argument and AR’s rebuttal; plus the opinion of race teams across the country can all be read here. Five Star went ahead and made the bodies available for purchase last month without receiving ABC Committee approval.

With that in mind, the ABC Committee released another statement on Tuesday afternoon that addressed the reporting of the subject and outlined the latest needs it has from Five Star before it would consider approving it.

READ MORE: Complete Snowball Derby coverage

The complete statement can be viewed below.

An Open Letter from the ABC Body Committee:
December 4, 2018

Track, sanctioning bodies and series leaders that deal specifically with the ABC Body (Approved-Body-Configuration) as the ABC Committee have assembled the following in regard to any previously published information in the media and/or on social media. The following is intended to establish the position and declare that the ABC Committee has not approved the new Five Star body for 2019. Any other information that has been released is not representative of the track, sanctioning bodies and series leaders that are the ABC Committee.

It is the intent of the ABC Committee to let all stakeholders in the entire short track racing industry know that despite previous statements in regard to compensation that “compensation” carried no weight in the decision to not approve the proposed Five Star body.

In an effort to provide complete transparency, the committee detailed the process of this topic. To date, in regard to the proposed Five Star body, Five Star has been the initiator and in control of all subsequent development, wind tunnel testing, and informational meetings. During the original development of the ABC Body, a set of guidelines had previously been established. In addition to the previously established guidelines the committee examined and proposed a per part fee (in regard to compensation) to establish a neutral and non-manufacturer based route of testing and development, which would remain open and published to approve and determine the approval of any new part and or body component from any manufacturer.

Committee leaders felt with Five Star initiating all testing and development activities since they were responsible for the complete design and submission, it may have represented a dictation to control the development in the industry and take it in a direction that worked against the original conceptual direction of the committee, which continues to be the outlook and preservation of short track Late Model racing throughout North America. There was never a proposal which benefitted any member of the ABC Committee. Many committee members receive no support from any specific manufacturer. The proposed program was intended to cover the cost of wind tunnel testing, purchase professional analysis, and the travel associated with ensuring the approval process was in the best interest of the entire industry.

The proposed program was adamantly opposed by the submitting manufacturer and removed from negotiation. In turn, since the time it was removed from the proposal, information was presented to the marketplace that did not reflect the intent of the proposed program

ABC Committee members have made multiple attempts and continue active communication in regard to bringing the industry together, primarily Five Star and AR Bodies (currently the two approved ABC Manufacturers), in an attempt to introduce a “new” look to Late Model racing throughout North America. It is the feeling of all Track, sanctioning body and series leaders that this effort must be made “together” as with all previous ABC (Approved-Body-Configuration) efforts which set the industry standards.

ABC Committee, track, sanctioning body and series leaders feel that the entire industry remain positively informed in regard to all aspects of the decision not to approve the body:

  1. The success of bringing the country together with one common body design, which currently exists, was based on the co-operation of the two body manufacturers working together to develop one shape. Since the inception and development of the Approved-Body-Configuration late model racing moved from regionalized rules and bodies, to a present day format which rewards all stakeholders with a format acceptable throughout North America. There is no intent to move away from that benefit. Even if the manufacturers were in agreement with how to proceed together with one shape, there would still be challenges of having two body styles (new and current). The ABC series leaders were willing to take on that challenge of having two different shapes. As the current process developed, however, the group of leaders did not feel confident in approving an environment where there were three distinctly different body styles (the current common shape used by both manufacturers, a new Five Star body and a new AR body). This presented too many variables for the industry. The industry already faces many challenges and providing a stable and acceptable atmosphere is critical in the preservation and development of Late Model racing throughout North America.
  1. If the two manufacturers were to agree to the new shape provided by Five Star, a final wind tunnel test under the direction of ABC Committee, Tracks, Sanctioning Body, Series leadership and independent and neutral technical personnel would still need to be conducted. Previous wind tunnel tests were led solely by manufacturer officials. The most recent test was witnessed by ABC series leaders, however did not provide completed data and data verifications were not completed. A key component that must be analyzed, but was not in the tests witnessed by series officials, is the proposed new body vs. the current body in “yaw”. Industry experts have stated that this is a critical comparison that must be made before determining if the two body styles are truly similar in performance. Any statement of equality prior to that would be clear speculation.

ABC Committee, tracks, sanctioning body and series leaders are committed to having a new body in the future, but are steadfast in their position of ensuring its success by making sure the body manufacturers continue to develop a plan that has the entire industry once again working together to continue a uniform and successful path for all stakeholders. The success and the evolution of the ABC body program in its current format is a testament to the validity of a program where all parties worked “together” in regard to the preservation and development of Late Model racing in North America.

If you like what you read here, become a Short Track Scene Patreon and support short track journalism!

Read more Short Track Scene:

Matt Weaver is the owner and founder of Short Track Scene. Weaver grew up in the sport, having raced himself before becoming a reporter in college at the University of South Alabama. He is also the associate motorsports editor of Autoweek Magazine and its website, which allows him to cover the highest levels of the sport.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Anonymous

    December 5, 2018 at 12:16 am

    It’s all about the money that ABC committee wants to extort from five star. Tracks Across the Nation are tired of this silliness and are approving the body for use in 2019.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Facebook

Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement

More in Super Late Models